The Woke movement, if it
is not yet as severe in France as in the United States and Canada, has
nevertheless made a significant breakthrough in France: children and
adolescents are already discussing in schoolyards and on social networks. to
know if they are "boy" or "girl" and are very sensitive to
the current phenomenon of guilt, which requires them not to claim to be
"boy" or "girl" under penalty of being banned as
"homophobic" . Adults who oppose the Woke program are, for their
part, called "fascists" and "racists". A new cultural norm
is therefore being imposed...aimed at destroying the archetypes on which our
civilization is based.
On the legitimate
pretext of preventing the stigmatization and persecution of "transgender
people", it is a real brainwashing to which children and adolescents are
now subjected via social networks.
Dr. Nicole Delépine
traces here the progression of this ideology in France
Unfortunately, as in the
USA, only the reactionary right in France explains and fights this insidious program,
resulting from lobbying which invokes the need for respect and tolerance to
impose its views: who could be "against" respect and tolerance? ?
This is how this program is progressing, while as the association SOS Education
explains very well below, it is above all a source of immense suffering for
children disoriented by what is put in their heads.
The fact that this
program is mainly supported in Anglo-Saxon countries by the radical left and
opposed by the conservatives or the extreme right prevents the French left from
reacting. However, there is urgency. Because many parents currently have no
idea what is going on, or are at a loss and do not know how to react to what
their children are telling them.
If it does not want to
permanently lose all credibility, the French left must pull itself together and
solve its own problems of identity (which makes it so permeable to Woke
theories). Indeed, it has reached the point where if the right proclaimed that
2+2=4, it would not dare agree with it, thus paving the way wide open for the
world described by Orwell. If the "left" identity consists only in
taking the opposite view of what the right defends, then it is no longer
distinguishable from the macronist far-center whose Woke ideology is the creed.
This Radio Quebec
program therefore benefits from being seen by parents and grandparents, in
order to visualize for themselves this short overview of what is happening in
the United States and Canada, and to realize that this is the prelude to what
will come to us. In order to also grasp the broader agenda that stands behind
it, namely the banning of heterosexuality in order to put an end to natural
sexual reproduction and impose the technological reproduction of human beings.
That is to say the transhumanist program.
Not only that, but
simultaneously promoting the normalization of child abuse, teaching children
that it is not wrong or criminal for an adult to want to have sex with a
five-year-old.
This dystopia is such
that it arouses reactions in the homosexual and LGBTQ communities
themselves...: if the members of these communities have fought to have their
rights recognized, they do not all intend to be instrumentalized to justify
this estruction of fundamental landmarks.
A very interesting
interview with Pauline Quillon on her book "Enquête sur la dysphorie de
genre" (57mn) allows us to go in depth into the subject:
On September 29, 2021, the Ministry of National
Education produced a circular intended to define the conduct to be adopted by
teachers and other staff when dealing with “transgender students” or “gender
questioning”. “Transidentity is a fact that concerns the school institution”,
we read; the announced objective is to accommodate these pupils as well as
possible by accepting the change towards the "felt" gender, possibly
by hiding the pupils' claims from their parents, and if necessary by giving
access to different toilets or by changing the first names of the pupils.
children on school cards. The association SOS Education, at the origin of a
documented note on the alarming and dangerous nature of pediatric transitions
in full swing, sees in this circular the institutionalization of the so-called
"transaffirmative" ideology in the school, and has launched a
petition that brings together more than 13,000 signatories. Interview with the
general delegate of the association Sophie Audugé.
Talker. What do you see in Jean-Michel Blanquer's
circular on "gender identity in schools"?
Sophie Audégé. The first
thing that is disputed is that transidentity is a fact: in reality, it is an
ideology, not a fact. The stated idea of the
circular is that we should not stigmatize children who ask themselves questions
about their gender. But it is in the very nature of the school not to
stigmatize children, we did not need to make an 11-page circular for such a
simple objective. In reality, this circular is not a circular but a manifesto
which takes up the entire argumentative corpus of what is called
transaffirmative ideology. It is not just about recognizing the rights of
transgender people, but above all about taking up the cause of the principle of
gender self-determination felt for each person – whatever their age. The felt
gender is envisioned as something that would be a deep, almost transcendent and
therefore non-debatable feeling, where biology has no place, nor the emotional
state or the period of life of the person who expresses it; exit also the
identity upheavals of adolescence, personal situations, intra-family
relations... And it is in this respect that transidentity is not a fact, but an
ideology disseminated by activists who seek to convert a maximum of people. It
is not a biological fact, not a scientific fact, and as such she does not have
to go to school.
Moreover, in France,
this ideology has not been the subject of public debate. In other countries, as
is the case in Canada for example, Justin Trudeau and his ministers tell you
that transidentity is the new world, it is the new social norm that we want to
apply. They clearly tell parents who don't agree with transidentity that they
are the problem, that if they don't accept it, they will be responsible for
their child's suffering, and they tell them: "it's better having a
transgender son than a dead daughter”, the choice is yours… If you are a parent
in Canada, you know that it is like that in school and in the law. But in
France, at no time did the power in place say that transidentity could be a new
social norm and that it should be recognized as a social fact at school. In
reality, this ideology has infiltrated in a totally insidious way. When you
entrust your children to the school of the Republic, you expect it to guarantee
the protection of your children, in a framework dedicated to teaching and the
transmission of knowledge. Not to send such messages to your children.
How did we come to institutionalize this ideology?
The circular effectively
institutionalizes a movement that had already entered the school for a long
time. To be completely honest, we should all have intervened long before,
because all the transaffirmative semantics were already in place, already relayed
by a certain number of interventions made to children by various LGBTQ+
associations or Family Planning. They disseminate the whole transaffirmative
term to the children, they distribute questionnaires in the classes asking the
students if they feel like a girl or a boy, binary or non-binary... they are
told: if your parents "gender you" or "you misgender", it
is an act of violence that you can denounce. These remarks already existed, we
knew it, but for some reason that cannot be explained, the entire educational
community considered that it was not serious enough to oppose it with firmness.
No one, no doubt, had envisaged that the Minister of National Education would
take up the cause of this transaffirmative ideology.
The circular refers to
several associations of this movement, in particular the association Le MAG
Jeunes LGBT. However, this association is part of the European federation of
transaffirmative associations IGLYO, which produced a report in November 2019
which details a lobbying protocol to infiltrate public policies and pass the
affirmation of the gender felt in the law, with a will displayed to reach young
people. It is still unlikely that the Minister of Education would relay the
arguments of such an association in his circular. This association is approved
by the National Education, it receives subsidies to go to schools to serve the
good word... It also has a partnership with a cosmetics brand acclaimed by
young people, and not the least, Sephora, which has a communication campaign
for the launch of a palette of eyeshadows specifically intended for transgender
people with a very popular influencer on social networks. Is there no conflict
of interest? All of this raises fundamental questions that no longer have
anything to do with the cause of respect for the rights of homosexuals and
transsexuals, and even less with school. What is at stake here is a
modification of the social norm and a huge business! This has infiltrated the
school through associations, and Jean-Michel Blanquer has just
institutionalized this new norm at school. There will be a before and an after.
Let's approach things a bit concretely: what are the
consequences of gender transition among young people? What are the three stages
of this transition that you describe in your report, and where are we in
France, legally, vis-à-vis all these steps?
Indeed, this is the
second point of our opposition: the first thing is that ideology should not
enter the school, and the second thing is that it is contrary to the higher
interest of the child. Our approach at SOS Education was to document ourselves
very seriously in order to assess the issue and the risks from the point of
view of the best interests of the child. Transactivists do not hesitate to
blackmail suicide as we have seen with the example of Canada. Obviously this is
a very serious matter that requires our full vigilance. We documented ourselves
to disentangle the true from the false and have the most objective opinion
possible.
What allows us to have
this objective opinion is that a number of countries – unfortunately for them
and fortunately for France – have been engaged in pediatric transition
processes for ten years already. The first to initiate such a process were the
Netherlands, with a fairly specific protocol, which started from a fairly
significant exploratory child psychiatric support. This protocol made it
possible to support the children concerned over the long term: the challenge
was to evacuate any other origin of the malaise that would not have been linked
to the incongruence between their felt gender and their birth sex.
SE
SAISI
