Method AND Power COMPARISON 1933 - 2025

 

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Adolf Hitler's Speech to the Reichstag on 23 March 1933 and Donald Trump's Inauguration Speech as President of the United States on 20 January 2025: A Comparative Analysis
This analysis focuses on recurring themes, tone, and proclaimed objectives.

Comparison of Main Themes

Theme	Adolf Hitler (1933)	Donald Trump (2025)
National Unity	Call for moral and political unity to overcome economic and social crises.	Call for a renewal of American greatness and unity against decadence and threats.
National Security	Emphasis on a strong state to restore order and discipline.	Declaration of a national emergency at the southern border to enhance security.
Blame of Enemies	Rejection of Weimar’s democratic experiments as the cause of crisis.	Designation of drug cartels as "terrorists" and criticism of past policies.
Appeal to God	Explicit mention of God's help in fulfilling the national mission.	Invocation of patriotic and religious values to justify new policies.
Sacrifice for the Future	Demand for immediate sacrifices to secure future prosperity.	Announcement of difficult measures for the "salvation" of future generations.

Comparison of Tone and Intentions

• Deceptive Unifying Tone:
• Hitler adopted a moderate, unifying tone to justify total power concentration, promising to solve unemployment while preparing repression.
• Trump used populist rhetoric focused on strong and immediate action, rejecting compromise to combat "internal and external enemies" (cartels, immigration).
• Criticism of Previous Institutions:
• Hitler blamed the weaknesses of parliamentary democracy to justify the need for authoritarian government.
• Trump criticised the previous administration and invoked "failed policies" to justify radical changes.
• Messianic Vision:
• Both speeches present their leadership as providential answers to national crises, positioning their governments as the only saviours of the people.

Although the historical contexts differ profoundly, similarities are evident in rhetorical strategies. Both leaders use promises of national renewal, the designation of enemies to consolidate power, and pseudo-protective discourse to mobilise the populace. This illustrates how political language can manipulate public opinion by playing on fears and hopes at different times.

The comparison between Donald Trump's and Adolf Hitler's behaviour raises questions about power usage, emotional manipulation, and implicit or explicit expansionist objectives. While acknowledging vastly different historical contexts, parallels emerge in rhetorical strategies, economic visions, and geopolitical stances.

Worldview and Expansionism

• Trump: Trump mentioned in his 2025 speech a desire to "flood the world with American oil" and strengthen the United States' economic dominance. Although he does not explicitly discuss military conquest, his statements align with global economic domination strategies. His policies are based on economic nationalism (such as "America First"), protectionism, and using natural resources as geopolitical tools.
• Hitler: In his early speeches, Hitler did not explicitly announce a desire for world conquest. However, his ideology, as outlined in Mein Kampf and subsequent addresses, centred on Lebensraum (living space), justifying territorial annexation and the domination of so-called inferior peoples. Economic resources, including control of raw materials, were pivotal in his strategy.
• Comparison: Trump uses economic language to discuss conquest—market domination and resource exports—where Hitler employed racial and territorial justifications. Both seek hegemony, albeit through different means.

Use of Democracy as a Tool of Legitimacy

• Trump: He invokes democracy and the American people to justify unilateral policies, positioning himself as the nation’s saviour against a "corrupt elite" while attacking press freedom, judicial institutions, and the electoral process when unfavourable.
• Hitler: Hitler rose to power using the democratic structures of the Weimar Republic, which he quickly dismantled with emergency laws, presenting himself as the legitimate people's representative.
• Comparison: Both leaders use democracy as a pretext rather than a goal. Hitler abolished democracy outright; Trump undermines it by attacking checks and balances.

Internal and External Enemies

• Trump: Trump identifies external enemies (China, Iran, Mexican cartels) and internal adversaries as threats. He frequently labels opponents as "traitors" or "anti-American," fostering division and eroding democratic dialogue.
• Hitler: Hitler swiftly labelled internal enemies (Jews, communists, trade unions) as responsible for Germany’s woes, orchestrating hate campaigns that led to systematic crimes.
• Comparison: Both use enemy figures to unite their base. Trump’s targets are primarily political and economic; Hitler’s were ethnic and ideological.

A Worrying but Nuanced Parallel

Trump's economic ambitions and rhetoric do not imply extermination policies. However, his methods of societal division, calls to force, and attacks on democratic institutions recall early 20th-century dangers. If Trump weakens international structures, his economic nationalism could resemble Hitler's expansionist militarism without racial ideology.

The diplomatic or populist disguise of radical intentions is a common strategy for leaders implementing discriminatory policies without immediate public or institutional backlash. Comparing Trump's language with Hitler's reveals troubling similarities despite different end goals and contexts.

Diplomatic Language for Radical Policies

• Trump: He uses phrases like "protecting Americans," "securing borders," or "restoring greatness" to justify restrictive immigration policies, describing migrants as potential criminals or security threats. Euphemisms like "extreme vetting" mask aggressive actions.
• Hitler: Hitler initially used moderate language to gain popular and elite support, planning extreme measures. Words like "purification" and "national renewal" masked systemic violence and genocide.
• Similarity: Both leaders frame unpopular policies with acceptable language. Trump uses security and prosperity to limit immigration; Hitler used stability and racial purity to justify persecution.

Dehumanisation of Immigrants and Minorities

• Trump: Portraying migrants as "rapists," "drug traffickers," or gang members, Trump fosters fear and mistrust, justifying mass expulsions and border walls.
• Hitler: Hitler depicted Jews and minorities as parasites and national corruptors, setting the stage for persecution and extermination.
• Similarity: Dehumanisation prepares the ground for human rights violations. Trump frames it in security terms, Hitler in racial ideology.

Fear as a Political Engine

• Trump: Fear of migrants, "others," and foreign powers (like China or Iran) drives his policy. He portrays imminent danger, presenting himself as the only solution.
• Hitler: Fear of communism, Jewish conspiracies, and hostile powers mobilised Germans behind increasingly extreme measures.
• Similarity: Both legitimise extraordinary actions through fear, uniting loyalists and marginalising opponents.

Similar Political Strategy, Different Consequences

Trump and Hitler share rhetorical strategies, using fear, dehumanisation, and euphemism for radical policies. However, Trump operates within democratic boundaries with checks and balances, whereas Hitler eliminated all opposition.

Democratic vigilance is crucial to prevent populist leaders from crossing into totalitarianism. While Trump’s language resonates with Hitler's, current safeguards remain vital.

Relationship with Economic and Financial Elites

• Trump: A billionaire businessman, Trump immediately gained elite support, with backing from figures like Sheldon Adelson, the Koch brothers, and Peter Thiel. His policies favour deregulation, corporate tax cuts, and traditional energy industries.
• Hitler: Initially lacking elite support, Hitler appealed to industrialists by promising anti-union policies, communist suppression, and economic militarisation.
• Comparison: Trump represents oligarchy in politics; Hitler courted elites to consolidate power. Both dynamics highlight alliances that shape authority.

Influence of Modern Tech Titans: Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos

• Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos: In contemporary political landscapes, figures like Musk and Bezos hold significant economic and technological influence, shaping public discourse, policy, and global markets.
• Musk’s and Bezos’ Role:
• Economic Power: Both have built vast empires—Musk in automotive, space exploration, and technology (Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter) and Bezos in e-commerce and cloud computing (Amazon).
• Political Leverage: Musk’s control over communication platforms and Bezos’ ownership of The Washington Post demonstrate how billionaires influence media narratives and public opinion.
• Comparison with Trump: Trump’s direct involvement in business mirrored the growing influence of entrepreneurial figures. Musk and Bezos, although not political leaders, wield soft power that parallels the elite support Trump leveraged. Unlike Hitler, who sought elite backing, these modern titans often act independently, reshaping industries and governance norms without direct political office.
• Democracy and Wealth: The concentration of power in few hands raises concerns about democratic erosion when corporate interests dominate policy decisions.

The Power of Economic Support as a Catalyst for Power

The key difference lies in the fact that Trump did not need to convince elites to support him, as he was already one of them. This gave him immediate economic and media leverage, allowing him to bypass certain regulatory mechanisms with well-funded campaigns and international influence networks. In contrast, Hitler had to build this relationship through political and economic concessions, particularly by crushing the political left.

A Democracy in Danger? Trump's close alliances with wealthy elites and media conglomerates allow him to manipulate public discourse in a way that, although different from Hitler’s approach, can prove equally dangerous. The concentration of wealth and power within a narrow group aligned with a populist leader poses a significant threat to democracy, as it weakens traditional checks and balances.

In this context, it is critical to monitor:

1.    Pressures exerted on the free press and judicial institutions.

2.    Political campaign financing and the influence of large corporations on government decisions.

3.    The use of economic power to shape foreign policy, as Trump did with economic sanctions.

4.    The role of influential entrepreneurs like Musk and Bezos in shaping societal values and technological control.

What should world society fear or protect itself from in order to bring democracy, freedom and fraternity?

This is a significant and sensitive question. To prevent any leader from becoming a modern version of authoritarian figures like Hitler, world societies need to be vigilant and proactive in safeguarding democratic values, freedoms, and social cohesion. Here are key aspects to fear and actions to protect democracy, freedom, and fraternity:

1. Erosion of Democratic Institutions

Fear: Weakening of judicial independence, electoral integrity, and parliamentary oversight.
Protection:

• Strengthen Checks and Balances: Ensure that the separation of powers remains robust.
• Empower Independent Institutions: Support a free judiciary, transparent election processes, and a strong legislative branch to counterbalance executive power.

2. Control over Information and Media

Fear: Manipulation of media narratives, censorship, and attacks on press freedom.
Protection:

• Support Independent Journalism: Defend freedom of the press and encourage investigative reporting.
• Combat Disinformation: Educate the public on media literacy to recognize and resist propaganda and fake news.

3. Vilification of Minority Groups

Fear: Policies or rhetoric targeting specific ethnic, religious, or social groups as scapegoats.
Protection:

• Promote Human Rights: Advocate for laws protecting minority rights and anti-discrimination policies.
• Foster Social Inclusion: Build community programs that encourage diversity and cross-cultural understanding.

4. Concentration of Economic and Political Power

Fear: Alliances between political leaders and wealthy elites to undermine democratic competition.
Protection:

• Enforce Fair Campaign Financing: Limit the influence of money in politics with transparency regulations.
• Strengthen Anti-Corruption Measures: Establish watchdogs to prevent cronyism and corruption.

5. Nationalism and Expansionist Rhetoric

Fear: Policies prioritizing aggressive economic or military dominance at the expense of global cooperation.
Protection:

• Promote International Cooperation: Engage in multilateral organizations to solve global challenges.
• Encourage Diplomacy: Prioritize peaceful conflict resolution over militaristic approaches.

6. Fear-Based Governance

Fear: Leaders using fear of external and internal threats to justify repressive policies.
Protection:

• Defend Civil Liberties: Resist laws that curtail freedoms under the guise of security.
• Encourage Rational Public Discourse: Use education to promote critical thinking and reduce reactionary politics.

7. Undermining of Fraternity and Social Cohesion

Fear: Division among people based on social, racial, or economic lines.
Protection:

• Foster Solidarity: Support movements and institutions that promote equality, inclusion, and mutual respect.
• Encourage Community Engagement: Empower citizens to participate actively in civic life and governance.

Democracy, freedom, and fraternity require constant vigilance, education, and active participation. Societies must prioritize human rights, the rule of law, and open dialogue while resisting fear-driven policies. By protecting these pillars, we prevent the rise of authoritarianism and nurture a world where liberty and justice prevail for all.

SAISI

The Enduring Conflicts of Our Time: Israel, Hamas, and the Role of Global Powers

 

The conflict between Israel and Hamas, most recently highlighted by the devastating attack on October 7th, 2023, reflects not only a deep-rooted historical and religious dispute but also a broader struggle for power, control, and influence in the region. As Israel continues its military campaign against Hamas in Gaza and targets Hezbollah forces in Lebanon, the question arises: Why do Jews, Israelites, and Arabs continue to fight over this small piece of land when the world is so vast? And why do global powers, particularly the United States, consistently intervene in these conflicts as well as in others, such as the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine?

To explore these questions, we must not only look at the history of the region but also at the geopolitical, economic, and environmental forces at play on the global stage.

Why Do Jews, Israelites, and Arabs Continue to Fight?

The conflict over the land of Israel and Palestine is as much about history, religion, and identity as it is about geography. The land holds immense religious significance for Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike, making it more than just territory; it is a symbol of faith, identity, and belonging.

1.     Religious Significance: For Jews, the land of Israel is their ancestral home, promised to them in their religious texts. For Muslims, Jerusalem is the third holiest site in Islam, and many Palestinians view the land as an integral part of their cultural and national identity. This clash of religious and historical narratives fuels the ongoing tension, making compromise difficult.

2.   Historical Grievances: The displacement of Palestinians during the establishment of Israel in 1948, and the subsequent wars, have left deep wounds on both sides. Israelis fear for their security in a region where they are often surrounded by hostile neighbors, while Palestinians seek recognition of their rights and the establishment of a state. These grievances have been passed down through generations, ensuring that the conflict continues.

3.   Geopolitical Interests: While the land itself is small, its location is strategic. Israel sits at the crossroads of the Middle East, a region rich in resources like oil and gas and with key maritime routes. Control over this region has long been of interest to global powers, adding an additional layer of complexity to the conflict.

The Role of the United States: Why Do They Keep Intervening?

The United States has been a central player in global conflicts, from the Middle East to Eastern Europe. But why do they intervene so consistently, whether in Israel and Palestine, or in the war between Russia and Ukraine?

1.     Geopolitical Power: The U.S. has long sought to maintain its influence on the global stage. By intervening in conflicts, they aim to shape the outcome in ways that align with their strategic interests. In the Middle East, maintaining a strong alliance with Israel is crucial for ensuring stability and influence in a region that is key to global energy supplies.

2.   Economic Interests: Some argue that many conflicts today are driven not by ideology or religion but by economic interests. Wars disrupt markets, drive up the price of commodities like oil and natural gas, and create opportunities for the arms industry and other sectors. The U.S., as a major economic power, benefits indirectly from these dynamics, whether through controlling resources or maintaining dominance in global markets.

3.   The War in Ukraine: In the case of the Russia-Ukraine war, the U.S. views Russia’s aggression as a threat to the post-World War II order that they helped establish. Ukraine represents the front line in a broader struggle between democratic nations and authoritarian regimes. By supporting Ukraine, the U.S. is not only defending a sovereign nation but also asserting its role as the guarantor of a global order built on rules and norms.

Is It About Religion, or Something More?

While religion and identity are certainly central to many conflicts, including the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, it is becoming increasingly clear that economic and geopolitical factors often play a more decisive role in driving wars. The global economy is intricately connected to these conflicts, as wars create shifts in markets, disrupt trade, and open opportunities for profit.

However, we cannot overlook another critical issue: the growing climate crisis. The devastation caused by climate change is directly linked to the actions of a few who prioritize profit over the planet. The wealthiest individuals and corporations, driven by greed, contribute disproportionately to environmental degradation, while the world’s poorest bear the brunt of its effects. Climate change is the result of decisions made by the excessively rich, who continue to exploit natural resources without considering the long-term consequences for the planet and humanity.

The Role of Climate Change in Global Instability

The consequences of climate change exacerbate existing global tensions. In regions like the Middle East, where water and arable land are already scarce, climate change intensifies competition over resources, leading to more conflict. Additionally, climate-related disasters, such as droughts, floods, and extreme heat, displace millions of people, creating new waves of refugees and increasing instability in already volatile regions.

In this context, the question arises: Are the conflicts we see today really about religious differences, or are they symptoms of a deeper, systemic issue rooted in greed and the quest for power?

Many believe that global elites and corporations are more interested in maintaining their wealth and control than in addressing the root causes of war, poverty, and environmental destruction. These powerful actors shape the world according to their interests, leaving the rest of society to deal with the consequences, whether through war, economic inequality, or environmental collapse.

A New Era: Could 2026 Be a Turning Point?

As the world faces these interconnected challenges, many hope that 2026 could mark the beginning of a global shift. There is growing awareness among people worldwide that the current system is unsustainable, and a change is needed to break the cycle of injustice that has long dominated society. This shift may come through grassroots movements, technological innovation, or a broader cultural awakening that prioritizes sustainability, equity, and peace over profit.

As people become more aware of the climate crisis and the role of the ultra-wealthy in perpetuating these conflicts, there is a growing sense that a reckoning is coming. In 2026, we may see a societal transformation, as the world demands a fairer, more just system that puts people and the planet above the interests of a small elite.

The World Pays for the Mistakes of the Few

In many ways, the global community continues to pay the price for the decisions of a few powerful leaders and elites. Whether it’s the U.S. intervening in yet another war, or billionaires profiting from global instability, it seems that ordinary people are the ones who suffer most. Resources that could be used to improve education, healthcare, and the environment are instead funneled into military budgets and reconstruction efforts after wars that never seem to end.

This cycle raises an important question: Are these wars truly about protecting religious identity or national sovereignty? Or are they, at their core, about maintaining control over resources, money, and power?

Conclusion: A Call for Reflection and Understanding

The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, like many of today’s wars, reflects not just a struggle over land, but a broader battle for influence, control, and, increasingly, the sustainability of our planet. The role of global powers, especially the United States, is pivotal in shaping the outcomes of these conflicts. However, as we reflect on the history of the region and the current state of world affairs, it’s clear that the global population, particularly the most vulnerable, often pay the highest price.

As wars continue and economies shift, climate change looms as an existential threat that could exacerbate global instability if not addressed. The actions of the few — driven by profit and power — have created a world where both conflict and environmental collapse seem inevitable, but 2026 might be a turning point. It could mark the beginning of a global awakening, where people worldwide demand an end to the cycle of injustice and begin building a fairer, more sustainable future.

Saisi

THIRD and Last PROPHECY of The VIRGIN FATIMA 1917 - BE AWARE

 

 

"When the world is asking for peace and security and repenting for all the evil it has done, sudden destruction, the new Armageddon, will come, and they will suffer."

These were the prophecies of the Virgin of Fatima when three children appeared in 1917 and said that by the dates of 2005, the end would come. Lucia was only 10 years old when the apparitions occurred, which began on May 13, 1917. Lucia and her two cousins saw the Virgin Mary on a tree for a period of six months. The Carmelite nun Lucia of the Immaculate Heart, the last survivor of the three children who claimed to see the Virgin Mary in the Portuguese town of Fatima, died at the age of 97 on February 14, 2005. She died in the convent of Coimbra where she had lived since 1948. This message was read by Pope John Paul II, who decided not to reveal this secret because he considered that doing so would bring panic and despair to the world. Now another part of this message is revealed.

NOT TO CAUSE PANIC, BUT BECAUSE IT IS CONSIDERED THAT PEOPLE ARE ALREADY PREPARED TO KNOW IT AND CAN BE AWARE OF WHAT IS APPROACHING IN THE COMING DATES. 

Sister Lucia first disclosed the message to Pope John Paul II, who, upon finishing reading it, was trembling and decided not to make it public out of fear of the reaction. The Virgin said explicitly to Lucia: "Do not be afraid, dear little one. I am the Mother of Heaven, speaking to you and asking you to make this message public to the entire world. By doing so, you will encounter strong resistance. Listen well and pay attention to what I say: Men must be corrected. With humble supplications, they must ask forgiveness for sins committed and those they may commit. Do you want me to give you a sign so that each one accepts my words that, through you, I say to humanity? You saw the prodigy of the Sun, and everyone, believers, unbelievers, peasants, citizens, wise men, journalists, laypeople, priests, all saw. A great punishment will fall upon the entire human race, not today, not tomorrow, but in the second half of the 20th century. I had already revealed it to the children Melania and Maximino, in 'la Salette,' and today I repeat it to you because the human race has sinned and trampled on the gift it is given. Nowhere in the world is there order, and Satan reigns over the highest positions, determining the course of things. "Because men are being led by the demon, sowing hatred and revenge everywhere. Men manufacture deadly weapons that can destroy the world in minutes. Half of humanity may be horribly destroyed. There will be conflicts between religious orders. God will allow all natural phenomena like smoke, hail, cold, water, fire, floods, earthquakes, inclement weather, terrible disasters, and extremely cold winters like those of these times to end the earth gradually, There will be incurable diseases, people mocking saints and the church. There will be uncontrolled killings, people will kill each other, many people will suffer. Some natural phenomena will happen before 2005 and will continue thereafter with greater intensity and destruction; the climate will change suddenly, extreme weather. They will not survive, lack of charity towards others and not loving each other as my son loved them. Many will wish to be among the dead because millions will lose their lives in seconds and suffer too much; new forms of life will come and contribute to destruction to gain more power for themselves and thus propagate their new race. The punishments that lie ahead of us, on Earth, are unimaginable, but they will come, without a doubt. God helps the world, but whoever does not bear witness to fidelity and loyalty to Him will be irreversibly destroyed because many have already turned their backs on Him and He can do nothing about it." Father Agostinho, residing in Fatima, received permission from Pope Paul VI to visit Sister Lucia. Father Agostinho expresses that she received him very saddened, with tears in her eyes, and said to him: "Father, Our Lady is very sad because no one has cared about her prophecy of 1917; people do not care about this prophecy. Thus, while the good ones have to follow a narrow path, the wicked are going on a broad path that leads them directly to destruction, and believe, Father, that punishment will come very soon from 2006 and will come without being able to stop it. Many souls may be lost, and many nations and states will disappear from the Earth; the world may be lost forever. The time has come for everyone to convey the message of Our Lady to their families, friends, and the whole world. We are close to the last minute, the last day, and the catastrophe is coming.               (BEWARE) WHAT AWAITS US? Everywhere talks about peace and security, but punishment will come without anything that can stop it. A MEANINGLESS WAR WILL CAUSE NUCLEAR DESTRUCTION. This war can destroy everything; it will be a disaster. Darkness will then fall upon us for 72 hours (3 days), and the third part that survives these 72 hours of darkness and sacrifice will begin to live in a new era. On a very cold night, 10 minutes before midnight, A GREAT EARTHQUAKE will shake the earth for 8 hours. The good, those who propagate the prophecy of the Virgin of Fatima, SHOULD NOT FEAR, but others will suffer the consequences of ignoring this warning; the earthquake will cause the destruction of a large part of the earth; some parts will separate and cause great disaster!

WHAT TO DO?

Sister Lucia says that the Virgin asks:

"Do not leave your house and do not let anyone strange enter it; new and unknown people will come, appearing to be good, and they will tell you to join them, to their new race and way of life, do not pay attention!.. These new 'people' will take advantage of the catastrophe that will happen in the world (earth)....

Sister Lucia continues according to what was revealed to her:  So that you may prepare and remain alive, like my children who also are; I will give you the following signs:

The night will be very cold. Strong winds will blow. There will be anguish, and soon an earthquake will begin that will shake the earth strongly. At home, close doors and windows and do not speak to anyone who is not inside it. Do not look outside; do not be curious, for this will be the wrath of the Lord. Light blessed candles, for three days, no other light will be able to illuminate. The movement will be so violent that it will move the earth 23 degrees and then return to its normal position. Then a total and complete darkness will come that will cover the entire Earth. Every evil spirit will roam freely, doing much harm to the souls that did not want to hear this message and to those who do not want to repent. Everything will be dark, and a great mystical cross will appear in the sky to remind us of the price that His Son paid for our redemption. Sister Lucia continues to relate what the Virgin entrusted to her:

Implore the following: "O God, forgive our sins, save us from the fire of hell, and take all souls to heaven, especially those most in need of your mercy."

Those who believe in the message that God sends and convey the message to others should not fear anything on the Great Day of the Lord.

Those who remain silent now will be responsible for this large number of souls lost due to ignorance.

When the Earth no longer trembles, those who still do not believe in our Lord will die horribly. The wind will bring gas and rain everywhere. Then the sun will rise. Many can live after this catastrophe, but once it starts, they should not look outside for any reason because God does not want any of His children to see when He punishes these sinners, He does not want them to see how they suffer, and He does not want them to see the pain that these evil people cause them.

It must be understood that God allows all this to happen, and it must be understood that God will punish all those who did not hear Him; this text says so, and that is why so much panic has been caused because God will unleash His uncontrollable anger against all those who are hurting the world.

Remember that the word of God is not a threat but good news, special; perhaps God allows it to be so because He wants to save them for Himself.

     Text Summary: The Third and Last Prophecy of the Virgin Fatima - Be Aware. According to Saint Lucia, the Virgin of Fatima prophesied in 1917 that the world would face sudden destruction and suffering around 2005. Lucia, one of the three children who witnessed the apparitions, revealed the message to Pope John Paul II in 2005 before her death. The message warned of a future where humanity, directed by evil, would face conflicts, natural disasters, diseases without cures, and wars between religious orders.

The Virgin Mary foretold a great punishment in the second half of the 20th century, including the manufacture of deadly weapons capable of destroying the world. The Earth would experience unprecedented natural phenomena, diseases, uncontrolled murders, and a lack of charity. The prophecy hinted at events before 2005, with increasing intensity thereafter. Lucia urged people to repent and seek forgiveness for their sins.

The revelation continued, predicting a time when a senseless war would trigger a nuclear disaster, resulting in darkness for 72 hours. Survivors, especially those who spread the Virgin of Fatima's prophecy, were advised not to fear but to prepare for a new era. Lucia emphasized the importance of staying indoors during the catastrophe, cautioning against trusting strangers who might exploit the situation.

Incorporating Global Events: The text, originating from a 1917 prophecy, does not specifically mention events like Covid-19, but its warnings about diseases without cures and natural disasters could be interpreted in the context of global health crises and climate change. Additionally, the mention of wars and conflicts aligns with on-going geopolitical tensions post-2005.

While the text doesn't directly reference specific dates for global events, the period it alludes to coincides with the occurrence of the Covid-19 pandemic (starting around 2019). Post-2005, various conflicts and wars have unfolded globally, contributing to the tumultuous landscape described in the prophecy.

SAISI