POLYGAMY AND LAWS

Some point to the possibility of bringing polygamy in our laws. Even if it's to hold in contempt as Marion M Le Pen, there is a risk in our country.

Polygamy does for a man to have several wives at once, is a situation diametrically opposite to our laws and our customs.

An argument is often advanced by the yes-yeses, who resigned in advance, those who always find excuses for everything, is to say that the French are polygamous as divorce and remarry. Nothing is more wrong. Polygamy is having several wives simultaneously. Or in divorce and remarriage it is successive wives, never (wives) at the same time. Others argue that men cheat on their wives and it's the same thing as polygamy. Certainly married men have mistresses, but there is no commitment to them, no common life several officially recognized. So it has nothing to do.

Our law has long condemned bigamy, then a fortiori polygamy! Bigamy is a beginning of polygamy, it is the fact of contracting a marriage without having dissolved the previous one, and has long been punishable by death in all countries Europe. Then we replaced the death penalty by various tortures. Even today bigamy is a criminal offense, punishable by one year imprisonment and 45,000 euros fine under Article 433-20 of the Penal Code. This also applies to polygamy, which otherwise under Article 147 of the Civil Code is null and can be declared invalid for thirty years.

Moreover, polygamy is a violation of the principle of equality between men and women enshrined in Article 16:1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 14 of the European Convention of Human Rights' man and the Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, adopted on 18 December 1979 by the General Assembly of the United Nations. Polygamy is not compatible with the republic. Should cancel these items to introduce in our law, and thereby abandon whole areas of which we structure. For the right, normally we structure.

In fact Westerners are basically monogamous, and when they marry they do not provide for divorce and remarriage even less. Divorce is generally considered a failure even if it is left and if you remarried. The man and woman do not marry in order to divorce even then if it happens more and more often.

This is monogamy that is listed in our morals: man lives for a single woman, at one point, and vice versa. Polygamy is too complicated materially, financially. And above all, psychologically, in a country whose roots are Christian and whose civilization has courtly love on a pedestal and has always sung the woman and love with a capital L.

Psychologically, our roots are Christian and therefore our morals we come from Christianity. Do not forget that Christ promoted monogamy. And faithfulness in marriage. He said that the repudiation was a scandal. From all this, our Western conception of love to last, even among atheists and non-Christians. In the union of two beings there are usually a reciprocal teaching, also legacy of courtly love, more or less consciously, which must advance them towards more love and understanding, and for that they need some time. Or what time does a man who has four wives, and how much time has a woman who shares her husband with two or three other wives? The dice are loaded.

Fidelity, while being required, as to feel loved and to love. In fact, polygamy is nothing other than the opposite of faithfulness. It is even adultery husband formalized within an institution. That institution not only ignores wives and deceived, but never oppresses so that if they allow themselves to do so, and would throw this one eye elsewhere, is death by stoning to expect in some Muslim countries. Where is the equality?

This institutionalized adultery and organized in the Muslim marriage is not only contrary to all that we founded, but it is when we think that once resultant adultery of the husband in the marital home was severely punished, and that in Islam, this adultery, is far from being punished, is encouraged!

In fact polygamy makes the unfortunate woman and man by encouraging low instincts of the one and the other, jealousy, quarrels, violence, and also the lightness of hand relations and other. For how to tie a relationship in this straitjacket? Or man and woman are made for relationship, for happiness. And what about the child? In the city of Les Mureaux we tolerate a polygamous family whose father has 46 children. What relation can a child have with such a father? Officially we recognize that this is destabilizing for the child. But nothing is done.

Nothing is further from our minds as polygamy. But now the question we believed definitively settled, and put away the rank of old fad for expired time, custom backward endangered, just good to be stored in a museum of human depravity and barbarism for insulting women and thus for humans, the issue resurfaced because in our naivety we officially support polygamous families settle in France, despite all good sense and our allocations of course.

Twenty thousand polygamous families live in France according to TF1. About 300,000 including the numerous children per family. Certainly much more in reality. None should be, even if their children are French or not!

We tolerate polygamy in France, despite our laws prohibiting despite ministerial directives that encourage certain measures of cohabitation to the withdrawal of the residence permit. Instructions that appear only on paper and are old, they will resist the flow of migrants?

This tolerance risk sliding into a passage through customs, and to law. Especially if we continue to Islamize us. After the veil ostracized, will we see wandering polygamous families who look askance French families monogamous? Polygamy, no thank you. The woman reduced to the rank of a slave, no thank you. The man who divides his time into four and whose wife is a quarter, a quarter husband for a quarter of a woman, no thank you.