Members of the French
parliament voted unanimously to double the length of their compensation in the
event of electoral defeat! They can vote quickly when is for their benefits! Whores have more right than them no?
Are the parliamentarians
completely disconnected from reality? The question then is learned that a law
has been passed unanimously and plans to double from six months to one year
duration of benefits if elected electoral defeat.
Perhaps even worse, the text provides to force a private company to reinstate elected at the end of its mandate, including in the municipalities of 10,000 or more inhabitants. Thus, the company will no longer be free of his recruitment.
While it is true that the equivalent in the public (the elected administration is reinstated at the end of its mandate) is questionable, we must say that we are campaigning for years for elected officials resign from the public service (including status is the subject of a bill to remove, which we support), as is done in Germany and the UK. In the UK, officials have even resign from the public service before the election!
The worst comes from the justifications given by the rapporteur of the text, the Socialist deputy of Val d'Oise Philippe Doucet.
Perhaps even worse, the text provides to force a private company to reinstate elected at the end of its mandate, including in the municipalities of 10,000 or more inhabitants. Thus, the company will no longer be free of his recruitment.
While it is true that the equivalent in the public (the elected administration is reinstated at the end of its mandate) is questionable, we must say that we are campaigning for years for elected officials resign from the public service (including status is the subject of a bill to remove, which we support), as is done in Germany and the UK. In the UK, officials have even resign from the public service before the election!
The worst comes from the justifications given by the rapporteur of the text, the Socialist deputy of Val d'Oise Philippe Doucet.
The latter explains that
"[a] mayor defeated in elections is not entitled to employment center. It
is that elected officials do not have fewer resources than the general
population because it can curb the ambitions of those who would commit
themselves "while the privileges of elected are many, and very attractive
remuneration.
Doucet also argues that this law does not only aim to mitigate the impact of electoral defeats, but especially to diversify profile elected by facilitating the engagement of private sector workers and women in particular. How convenient that this concern for renewal of political personnel coincides with the strengthening of the advantages of the current!
Doucet finally ensures that the date of passing of this law has nothing to do with the departmental elections since it would not benefit the beaten Sunday. "The law will enter into force on 1 January 2016. It initially wanted it applies to municipal 2014 but the parliamentary calendar n 'allowed to vote on the text that now."
If Doucet and parliamentarians who followed unanimously motivations are sincere about this law is that they are completely cut off voters who, as taxpayers, are their employers. How not to be struck by the simultaneity of the vote and the ballot of 22 and 29 March?
Doucet also argues that this law does not only aim to mitigate the impact of electoral defeats, but especially to diversify profile elected by facilitating the engagement of private sector workers and women in particular. How convenient that this concern for renewal of political personnel coincides with the strengthening of the advantages of the current!
Doucet finally ensures that the date of passing of this law has nothing to do with the departmental elections since it would not benefit the beaten Sunday. "The law will enter into force on 1 January 2016. It initially wanted it applies to municipal 2014 but the parliamentary calendar n 'allowed to vote on the text that now."
If Doucet and parliamentarians who followed unanimously motivations are sincere about this law is that they are completely cut off voters who, as taxpayers, are their employers. How not to be struck by the simultaneity of the vote and the ballot of 22 and 29 March?
Saisi?
No comments:
Post a Comment