The World Wide Fund for Nature, or World Wildlife Fund (WWF), now World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) has existed since 1961 and has been chaired since 2017 by Pavan Sukhdev, an Indian economist, who chaired the "Global Agenda Council" of the World Economic Forum on Ecosystems and Biodiversity (2009-2011) and intervened in Davos in 2010 and 2011.
Founded by a few notorious eugenicists, including Julian Huxley, it claims to "make growth rhyme with ecology and social progress"...
The WWF believes that "the company is at the heart of environmental issues" and therefore works in France in partnership with Danone, Coca-Cola, Bouygues, Carrefour, Sodexo, etc., see list here:
https://www.wwf.fr/qui-sommes-
The WWF is one of those huge NGOs working "for the preservation of biodiversity" while maintaining monopolistic capitalism.
WWF is part of the Steering Group of the F20 Foundations Platform, an international network of foundations and philanthropic organisations.
He stands out today by initiating the "Climate Pass" for presidential candidates. A discreet way to introduce the extent of the Pass vaccination to the climatic criteria. We know the nature and value of the "independent authorities" deployed over the past two years to set public health criteria, so when the WWF wants an "independent authority" to assess the decisions of the future president, we know in advance that this authority will be there to defend the economic and political interests of its funders and the expectations of the World Economic Forum.
It is urgent that all those who are sincerely committed to the preservation of biodiversity understand that the proclamation of this commitment is not always worth reality but is often instrumentalized for the purpose of maintaining and increasing financial monopolies.
Real ecological problems will not be solved by following those who largely contributed to create them.
“Climate Pass”: WWF wants an independent authority to assess the decisions of the future president
February 20, 2020
The international NGO WWF proposed to the presidential candidates to commit to submitting the decisions of the future executive to the examination of an independent authority, to make the next mandate “that of the way out of the ecological impasse”. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is asking presidential candidates on February 20 to commit to submitting the decisions of the future executive to the examination of an independent authority which will issue them a "climate pass" if they are compatible with the objectives of safeguarding the planet.
“Candidates, candidates, abandon vague speeches and empty promises: commit to making your mandate that of breaking the ecological impasse”, ask in a column published in the Sunday Journal the three leaders of WWF France , Isabelle Autissier, Monique Barbut and Véronique Andrieux. A negative opinion may lead the competent judge to declare this proposal inadmissible.
“WWF calls on you to make a commitment to submit each of the decisions of your presidential term to obtaining a climate pass,” they add. "Previous presidents have not had a green enough thumb to reduce France's ecological footprint," says the WWF. "Why ? Quite simply because nothing obliges them to do so”, judges the NGO, which notes that “in 2019, only 3% of the articles of law promulgated were evaluated in terms of their impact on the climate”. The decisions must be “compatible with the French objectives of reducing CO2 emissions and protecting biodiversity”
Hence the idea of an independent institution which would deliver this famous "climate pass" to the executive, after having assessed "each law, each decree, each order, each strategic roadmap or each international commitment likely to have an impact on the French trajectory of CO2 emissions or on the state of biodiversity”.
"As a 'climate watch', this authority will determine using reliable indicators whether the decision that is being considered is indeed compatible with the French objectives of reducing CO2 emissions and protecting biodiversity", explains the WWF. , adding that "a negative opinion may lead the competent judge to declare this proposal inadmissible".
“The State has demanded iron discipline from the French in the fight against an exceptional health crisis and nothing can any longer justify today that a Head of State does not impose the same discipline on himself in the fight against the crisis. ecological”, argues the WWF again. The mandate of the next president should be "that of breaking the ecological impasse", insists the environmental organization, inviting the candidates to think about it now in their programs. The WWF believes that "it is possible", promising to make proposals in the coming days.
Saisi
No comments:
Post a Comment